Hubby Leon, Wilderness Park Ranger, still has a job as of today with the Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior, and will be employed for the foreseeable future, at least until further litigation resolves the issues. See story below.
One of Leon's duties is to maintain the "Shooting Areas", removing debris which can include targets like microwaves, refrigerators, furniture, dishes, tires, pallets, etc. He also repairs fencing, is responsible for signage, parking areas, rest rooms, gates, truck maintenance, and working on cooperative projects with indigenous nations, among other things.
 |
Some of the Trash Leon Has to Deal With
|
From the Government Executive website May 22, 2025: (BOLD type is my emphasis)
A federal judge on Thursday indicated she will issue
a longer-term injunction that bans the Trump administration from
implementing layoffs, suggesting those actions were unlawful and in
violation of the Constitution.
President Trump, the White House
and the Department of Government Efficiency have all exceeded their
authorities in requiring agencies to develop and implement layoff plans,
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston said. She made her remarks at the
outset of a hearing in San Francisco on a lawsuit challenging the
reductions in force and one day ahead of the scheduled expiration of a
temporary freeze she previously placed on the layoffs.
“I do
believe the evidence before the court suggests that plaintiffs will
likely succeed on the merits of their claims,” Illston said. “I believe
injunctive relief, preliminary at this stage, remains necessary to
preserve the status quo and protect the power of the legislative
branch.”
She added the evidence strongly suggested that “the
recent actions of the executive branch usurp the constitutional powers
of Congress.”
Her existing temporary restraining order,
which she earlier this month put in place for two weeks, prevented
agencies from implementing their Agency RIF and Reorganization Plans.
Those plans were required by the Office of Personnel Management and
Office of Management and Budget, as well as President Trump’s executive
order that precipitated them. It applied to OMB and OPM, as well as the
departments of Agriculture Commerce, Energy, Health and Human Services,
Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Treasury,
Transportation and Veterans Affairs. It also applies to AmeriCorps, the
Environmental Protection Agency, the General Services Administration,
the National Labor Relations Board, the National Science Foundation, the
Small Business Administration and the Social Security Administration.
Illston
said every large-scale government reorganization effort in recent
memory, such as the one Trump is undertaking, has required congressional
approval.
“The president may not initiate a large-scale
executive branch reorganization without partnering with Congress to hold
otherwise would be telling nine presidents and congresses that they
misunderstood the Constitution,” Illston said. “I do not have that level
of self confidence.”
Much of the remainder of the hearing
concerned the scope of Illston’s potential preliminary injunction,
though attorneys for both sides also debated the merits of the case.
The
Trump administration has defended the layoffs by arguing the president
did not issue mandates for specific actions and OMB and OPM only
provided guidance for how agencies should conduct RIFs. Andrew Bernie, a
Justice Department attorney representing the government on Thursday,
said OMB and OPM do not view their roles as “substantively second
guessing agencies determinations.” He added the RIF blueprints were just
planning documents and agencies did not have to follow through on
them.
Danielle
Leonard, an attorney for the plaintiffs, countered that her team had
presented evidence of OMB and OPM overruling agencies that submitted
first drafts of their RIF plans.
“They are saying what to cut, when to cut, where to cut,” Leonard said.
The
Trump administration has largely complied with Illston’s order, though
some reorganization actions—such as the Interior Department’s efforts to
consolidate functions—have continued. Agencies have also moved forward
with the re-firings of employees in their probationary periods. Some
agencies have notified employees subject to layoffs that those efforts were paused.
Going
forward, Bernie suggested if Illston were to issue an injunction it
should be limited to only employees who are part of the unions bringing
the cases. Illston suggested she was looking to expand her order to
apply retroactively to benefit those already laid off, though she said
she may immediately pause enforcement of that part of the order so
employees do not “ping pong” back and forth.
The judge added she
could require agencies to reinstate to full working status those who
have received RIF notices but are still on paid administrative leave
waiting for their terminations to take effect. Agencies generally must
give 60 days notice before RIFs are finalized.
Doing so, she said, “makes a lot of sense, because it doesn't make sense to have employees sitting around not working.”
The
Trump administration has already appealed the judge’s restraining order
to both the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, though
neither entity has issued a ruling.
Office of Management and
Budget Director Russ Vought, who has helped orchestrate the Trump
administration’s federal workforce reduction efforts, told reporters on
Thursday all of the RIFs across government were conducted legally and
predicted the administration would ultimately prevail.
“They've
been an effort to scale down the federal workforce with care, with
wisdom about what's necessary to statutorily conduct and operate
agencies,” Vought said. “And I think at the end of the day, wherever
they're at, they're going to be successful when they get to the Supreme
Court."
The administration has also faced more targeted setbacks:
on Thursday, a federal judge in Massachusetts issued a preliminary
injunction blocking the Education Department
from carrying out its mass layoffs. Other judges have paused RIFs at
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Institute of Museum and
Library Studies. The legality of layoffs at the Health and Human
Services Department is currently being litigated.
 |
When he's not in the office, the views are expansive.
|